Before delving into the specifics of rate management, it is helpful to understand a few key concepts. More details are covered in later sections.

Projector's main goal from a scheduling standpoint is to pair up the proper resources with projects that have resource needs - a goal that it accomplishes through roles. In order to properly identify, summarize, and analyze those resources and the projects that they work on, Projector has levels based on internal Cost Centers and Client structures:

The two basic structures in Projector are the cost center rollup and client levels. Cost centers describe the internal structure of the organization, and can contain up to 23 levels. Clients describe the structure of the organization's external clients,

Individual projects are associated with engagements. Engagements, in turn, are associated with a cost center and a client. Resources are associated only with a cost center. While this diagram shows engagements and resources associated only with the lowest levels of cost centers and clients, in actuality, they can be associated with the client structure and cost center rollup at any level.

The reason that this relationship model is important in understanding rate management is that Projector uses it to provide an easy way to manage information such as rates and costs globally while still allowing the flexibility to handle exceptions when necessary. For instance, a company-wide set of rates can be managed at top cost center levels, but if a special agreement has been reached with the Paint Division of the ACME Corporation client, the company-wide rates can be superseded by the division-specific rates.

When trying to determine the correct rates for a particular hour on a particular project for a particular resource, Projector typically starts at the bottom of the model and works its way up until it finds the information it needs. For instance, to find the contract rate for a unit of work, Projector first looks to see if there is a rate override for the task code, and then for the role. If it doesn't find one in either of those places, it looks to see if the project has a rate card override. If it still doesn't find one, it looks to the lowest level of the client structure for a client-specific rate card. Projector continues working its way up the levels until it finally finds a rate card to use. For the purposes of this section, it's not important to understand the details of the exact order in which Projector searches; it's just important to understand the overall strategy that Projector uses to work its way up the model to find the information it needs.

Conversely, most organizations will find it easiest to manage its rates at the highest level possible, using the lower level rate overrides only when necessary. For instance, the organization can certainly enter a rate override for every single day for every single role on every single project. As you can imagine, however, this ends up being an impractical amount of information to have to administer. This is also unnecessary when Projector allows these data to be managed at a more global level.

Rates Versus Revenues

Throughout Projector, financial numbers are presented as rates and revenue and are linked by the following relationship:

As expected, revenue refers to the total amount of money that a client is charged for a resource, a project, or a time period. Rates refer to the amount per hour that is charged. While this relationship is a simple one, it applies to all types of revenues and rates such as standard revenue/standard rates, contract revenue/contract rates, and system revenue/system rates. In addition, the relationship also links resource direct costs and resource direct rates as follows:

Types of Rates and Revenue

Rates and revenues are represented within Projector as three types:

Projector uses a similar concept to represent the amount of money it costs the organization to supply resources to a project:

These three types of rates and revenue, as well as the most likely causes of the differences among them are summarized in the following diagram:

A very similar diagram can be created with standard, contract, and system revenues in addition to rates.

The process by which Projector obtains these types of rates and revenues is discussed in more detail in the Managing Rates section, and a more complete explanation of analyzing the differences among them is covered in the Analyzing Profitability section.

Managing Rates through Titles

Hourly rates and cost structures are mainly managed in Projector through the use of Titles. Overrides can be defined for individual task codes, roles, and resources, but those overrides are generally used to manage exceptions.
Titles are used to group resources that:

Smaller organizations that don't currently have or need strong title structures could certainly define a unique title for each billable employee. However, adopting this sort of structure early on may be helpful to limit the amount of administrative overhead required to sustain growth and increased complexity in the future.

Rate Management Entities

Rates in Projector are managed by using the following entities:

Updating Rates and Rate Cards

Generally within Projector, there are several ways to update the rates associated with a particular project, role, task code, and date combination: