...
When you visit the cost planning tab you are presented with a grid showing one row per expense type defined in your installation. There is also a dropdown box that allows you to switch between Client Amount, Disbursed Amount, and Expense Amount. Switching between the three options changes the grid. This next part is very important to understanding this tab - all three of these grids are mathematically tied together. So entering a Client amount of $100 in a cell causes the corresponding cells in the other two tables to change too.This is important to know because you can inadvertently modify/overwrite data you have entered in a different cell. Typically we see someone choosing to enter their planned expenses for just one of the three types and letting the other two auto-calculate. The table below explains the the three types.
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Client Amount | The amount that you intend to charge the client. |
| Disbursed Amount | The amount paid out-of-pocket, regardless of whether the company or the client is responsible for it |
| Expense Amount | The amount that the company intends to cover. |
The following is a gross simplification, but bear with me. Disbursed - Client = Expense. Which makes sense because anything the client doesn't cover has to be paid by the company. The actual relationship is more complicated than this and is explained below, but keep this in mind as a reference.
...
The relationship between disbursed amount and client amount in this case should be pretty clear. Just multiply the disbursed amount by the DMUP and you get the client amount. The difference is the expense amount. The table below visualizes the calculations.
| DMUP | Disbursed Amount | Client Amount | Expense Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| +50% | $100 | $150 | $0 |
| -50% | $100 | $50 | $50 |
| 0% | $100 | $100 | $0 |
The table above is based on specifying the disbursed amount first. But what if you specified the client amount instead? In this case we have to back calculate the disbursed amount.
| DMUP | Client Amount | Disbursed Amount | Expense Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| +50% | $100 | $66.67 | $0 |
| -50% | $100 | $200 | $100 |
| 0% | $100 | $100 | $0 |
Still following? Great. Let's tackle a special case for DMUP and client amount. Default markup percentages of 0%, 100%, and negative 100% cause some special things to occur.
- If you have an expense type with a default markup percentage of negative positive 100%, and you enter a client amount of $100, then the disbursed and expense amounts are impossible to back calculate. In this case Projector leaves them at zero. This behavior allows you to plan costs which result in 100% revenue. You can use this same setup to model costs that are all expense. By entering an expense amount, it will be written down to zero client amount. There is of course a caveat to this. If you have Treat Costs as Fees enabled, then we can indeed back calculate from client amount to disbursed and expense amount. In that case all three have the same value.
- If you have an expense type with a default markup percentage of positive negative 100%, and you enter an expense amount of $100, then the disbursed and client amounts are impossible to back calculate. In this case Projector leaves them at zero. Although this behavior is analagous to the negative markup example, this behavior of creating zero disbursed and client amounts does not seem useful. I can't imagine a scenario where you would want zero disbursed amount, but an actual expense amount.
- If you have an expense type with a default markup percentage of 0%, and you enter an expense amount of $100, then the disbursed and client amounts are impossible to back calculate. I can't imagine a scenario where you would want zero disbursed amount, but an actual expense amount.
| DMUP | Disbursed Amount | Expense Amount | Client Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0 | $100 | 0 |
| 100% | 0 | $100 | 0 |
| -100% | 0 | 0 | $100 |
...
Treat Costs As Fees (TCAF)
...